Jump to content

RDrewieske

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About RDrewieske

Previous Fields

  • My Toyota Motorhome
    89 Toyota Seabreeze
  • Location
    Happy Valley, Or

Profile Information

  • Interests
    National Parks

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

RDrewieske's Achievements

  1. Hi guys I'm the one that had the original brake problem, front locking up than pulling e brake to stop in an "e" stop. I have 1990 Seabreeze 156000 miles. This time I am replacing the master cylinder, and booster along with that proportioning valve. I found a shop manual pdf. thanks to someone else on this website. Thanks for everyone's ideas and input. Rick
  2. Hi last spring I had the brakes ck'd out he said he put new shoes and front pads on. Two years ago I had the whole brakes redone new rotors drums and cylinders. This problem showed up after the first overhaul. Thanks for the information.
  3. As any removed the loadsensing proportioning valve and replaced it with a inline tee. 1990 Toyota Seabreeze, have to pull the ebrake to stop in emergency situation the fronts lock up. Thanks for any information.
  4. Hi! Has anyone replaced engine fan with electric 89 V6. It has a 60amp alternator. Any help would be appreciated, thank you. RDrewieske
  5. I have a 90 Seabreeze with a 4.11 to 1 rear end has anyone chgd ratios to 4.56 or 4.88 rear end. for better fuel performance.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Maineah

      Maineah

      Won't help the mileage but it will help the power up hills (at the expense of mileage)

    3. Boots

      Boots

      I have seen dual speed axles, as an add on, I don't know if there are widely available. All the advise so far is valid, why are you considering? I would think going the other way (or alternatively) change to a dual rear end with 4.56 and something like 3.88 - that way you have better uphill power and better fuel mileage

    4. Boots

      Boots

      I have seen dual speed axles, as an add on, I don't know if there are widely available. All the advise so far is valid, why are you considering? I would think going the other way (or alternatively) change to a dual rear end with 4.56 and something like 3.88 - that way you have better uphill power and better fuel mileage

×
×
  • Create New...